Stolen on the drive

Know if a teenager you, takes the car of their parents or someone without authorization, it may seem like a small crime. But it is a crime. Ride in a stolen car, especially if it is accompanied by a group of friends, can seem fun as nonsense, but the dangers and the consequences are serious. IdentificationJoyriding in most cases occurs when a teenager a car of a parent, parent or other person and drives around takes, friends who are sometimes involuntary accomplice usually pick up. The hope is to take and return the car completely the biggest dangers of joyriding undetected.DangersOne is that it often leads to accidents. It is not uncommon to hear young people killed the, connected in an accident to the joyriding. Most young people who take a joyriding cars are without license and experience in the operation of a motor vehicle. This lack of experience can easily lead to an accident and cause damage to property, injury or death of the driver, passengers or others.CrimeJoyriding is a criminal offence as a criminal offence. While it is considered a form of theft. It is not the same as flight, because there is no intention to steal the vehicle. It is relatively easy to someone demonstrated this crime to condemn because the intention is not necessary. A perpetrator is classified, joyriding basically because most criminals are underage.Criminal RepercussionsPunishment for joyriding vary smaller Act crime and the ability of probation to several years in prison, to find a good lawyer. The driver can continue. If a passenger in the car, even if you don't see the car p warAufstieg without permission.DefensesWhen sought, for a ride in a stolen car, there are several defense CoalitionYou can. The most common is "Lack of know" which means that you do not know which car you were riding was taken. The pilot can claim know "lack", if you have lied to engine and asked, lead. Mviolation that Iranda rights is also a means of defence, if you can prove that the arresting officer did not read the Miranda rights on the accused. A further defence is the denial of the right to advise what means that the accused was asked to see a lawyer and was still called into question.